Censoring a Mag Cover with Elton, BF and Baby? Really??

Join Me in My Fight for Equality on My Gay Pride FB Page

Us Weekly Elton John Cover Censored by Harps!

This is ridiculous!

Harps – which I have never heard of but is apparently a grocery store chain in Arkansas – censored last week’s Us Weekly Magazine/. You know, the one that has Elton John and David Furnish posing with their new baby.

I know a ton of people have all made numerous calls to the grocery stores chains PR rep – and none of us has heard anything back from them. It’s still important to make your voice heard, even if they don’t want to listen, in this day of blogging and social media they can be called out for their douchebaggery as well.

I’ve heard that as of very early this morning they had already gotten upwards 50 calls this morning alone – and now the PR director is only accepting voice mails.

Want to express your outrage? Call 870-425-6556.


Gay and Lesbian Jewelry

Related posts:

  1. I’m the Ticket to Invite Only Designer Sample Sales Yeah Baby!
  2. Lesbian News: Gorgeous Amber Heard Has Left The Closet
  3. Gay Icons Crash and Burn Baby!
  4. Message From the Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund
  5. Shocking Advocacy of Violence Against Transgender Children

3 Responses to Censoring a Mag Cover with Elton, BF and Baby? Really??

  1. Anyone could have switch the coverings from a different magizine or it could be just someones opinon of what should be covered in there store..if you dont like it then don’t shop at that store…i dont understand why everything has to be over exaggerated just because there gay if someone would have covered a straight couple ya’ll would have just thought oh someone must have switched the things or just walked by like it was nothing…Just because your gay doesn’t mean everything has to be exaggerated just be normal since thats what everyone claims to want…thanks

  2. The point is that if it were a straight couple no one would ever have thought to cover it and the fact that it was covered is due to the fact that it was a gay couple with a child. That magazine cover should have been treated just like any other celeb couple with their child. Jesus, they have no trouble putting the faces and stories of 16 yr olds who have babies out there for all to see, they don’t censor that. How is a gay couple who have been together forever posing with their child worse than that? It’s ridiculous.

  3. Hi just drop by reading this interesting post. I certainly agree to the idea of this updates. Thanks so much for this one.

Leave a Response